From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Refresh of http://orgmode.org Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 16:18:56 +0100 Message-ID: <87liqdzwv3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87k461we9q.fsf@gnu.org> <20111213215015.GA53490@kenny.fritz.box> <877h20vtkd.fsf@gmx.com> <87d3br8o14.fsf@gnu.org> <87liqfyou6.fsf@gmx.com> <87sjkmqxsn.fsf@gmx.com> <87k45y0w65.fsf@gnu.org> <878vmd50r4.fsf@gmx.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:39385) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RbD4S-00079s-Ft for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 10:18:14 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RbD4I-0003e8-MD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 10:18:08 -0500 Received: from mail-ee0-f41.google.com ([74.125.83.41]:52071) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RbD4I-0003e2-Gn for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 10:17:58 -0500 Received: by eekc41 with SMTP id c41so2312117eek.0 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 07:17:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <878vmd50r4.fsf@gmx.com> (Eric Schulte's message of "Thu, 15 Dec 2011 08:10:39 -0700") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eric Schulte Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Eric, Eric Schulte writes: > Exactly, that is why it is ignored. :) > > I did this mainly so that I could export index.org to generate a base to > work off of (before I had the project description you just send in > another email). Okay, no problem. > Should the publish project definition be added to the orgweb repository > in a non-exporting file, so that anyone can build the site locally for > testing? Sure -- maybe just add a README. >> The two others don't apply. There seem to be blank lines where there >> should not. Can you resent them? > > Since you seem to like the changes listed above I've just pushed these > patches up directly, so they should now be applied. Thanks. We lost the blue background in the top bar and the correct z-index so that text don't overlap. -- Bastien