From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Uwe Brauer Subject: Re: org-mime-htmlize and org-preview-latex-fragment Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 23:41:50 +0100 Message-ID: <87limsdzrl.fsf@mat.ucm.es> References: <87vclwe04f.fsf@mat.ucm.es> Reply-To: Uwe Brauer Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37503) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SAqhs-00013G-NY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 18:42:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SAqhq-0005wf-7T for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 18:42:08 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:33506) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SAqhq-0005wC-0h for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 18:42:06 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SAqhn-0003hF-5X for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 23:42:03 +0100 Received: from 11.pool85-54-11.dynamic.orange.es ([85.54.11.11]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 23:42:03 +0100 Received: from oub by 11.pool85-54-11.dynamic.orange.es with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 23:42:03 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org >> On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 23:34:08 +0100, Uwe Brauer wrote: > Now org-mime-htmlize allows me to htmlize a message buffer > but seems not to work with org-preview-latex-fragment > either the png is not exported or I obtain an error message > of the sort: > Unknown conversion type nil for latex fragments. I am very confused the code in question contains a line of the sort: (org-export-with-LaTeX-fragments "dvipng") Uwe Brauer So the functionality seems to be implemented?