From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: "# <<tag>>" should stick to the following text
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 17:54:31 +0930
Message-ID: <87lil4jt4w.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
References: <8662c9rqtq.fsf@mercure.progiciels-bpi.ca>
	<87397dgg9a.fsf@gmail.com> <86wr4orffa.fsf@mercure.progiciels-bpi.ca>
	<87y5p44gbi.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60197)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1SRJFK-0007ll-89
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 07 May 2012 04:24:47 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1SRJFI-0001C9-MZ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 07 May 2012 04:24:41 -0400
Received: from ch1ehsobe001.messaging.microsoft.com ([216.32.181.181]:52421
	helo=ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1SRJFI-0001AG-IL
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 07 May 2012 04:24:40 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87y5p44gbi.fsf@gmail.com> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Mon, 7
	May 2012 09:10:25 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Fran=C3=A7ois?= Pinard <pinard@iro.umontreal.ca>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com> writes:

[...]

> On the other hand, every regular target will be invisible. Let me
> explain.
>
> At the moment, "<<tag>>" and "# <<tag>>" produce, respectively, "<a
> name="tag" id="tag">tag</a>" and "<a name="tag" id="tag"></a>".
>
> In a not so distant future "<<tag>>" will produce "<a name="tag"
> id="tag"></a>" and "# <<tag>>" will be ignored.

And I think this is indeed the right way to go.  Cleaner overall.

Thanks,
eric

-- 
: Eric S Fraga (GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D) in Emacs 24.1.50.1
: using Org release_7.8.09-529-g035ab3.dirty