From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Abrahamsen Subject: Re: problem with org-element-parse-buffer Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 12:29:26 +0800 Message-ID: <87lidqwbix.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <87haovrwcs.fsf@micropit.couberia.selfip.net> <87y5i76qfv.fsf@gmail.com> <877gpbrz1g.fsf@micropit.couberia.selfip.net> <87ehjjkx8n.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51611) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TcTmn-0001pX-2Y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 23:25:42 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TcTmm-00081n-89 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 23:25:41 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:45585) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TcTmm-00081j-0n for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 23:25:40 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TcTmt-0005P6-LW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 05:25:47 +0100 Received: from 50-56-99-223.static.cloud-ips.com ([50.56.99.223]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 05:25:47 +0100 Received: from eric by 50-56-99-223.static.cloud-ips.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 05:25:47 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Peter Münster writes: > >> On Mon, Nov 12 2012, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > >>> In Org, planning info (scheduled, deadline, and closed) must be put just >>> after the headline. Your example isn't valid. >> >> Then, org-agenda should ignore that too, shouldn't it? > > Strictly speaking, yes. But Org Agenda is a bit permissive (and not only > for that thing). Do you want to help basing Agenda on Elements? This is something I was wondering about -- so that is the plan eventually? This is something I've wanted for a while, as it would make some of my little personal projects a lot easier. I'd be happy to help if there's a roadmap, and if I can be fed bite-sized problems to deal with. E