From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: can babel results show time of evaluation? Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 20:22:26 +0100 Message-ID: <87libao4r1.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87haly2aag.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87libawqb4.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47031) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U0dFB-0002nL-Ao for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 14:22:50 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U0dF9-0008Nf-EE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 14:22:49 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com ([209.85.212.171]:61673) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U0dF9-0008NX-7n for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 14:22:47 -0500 Received: by mail-wi0-f171.google.com with SMTP id hn14so4026430wib.4 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 11:22:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87libawqb4.fsf@gmail.com> (Eric Schulte's message of "Wed, 30 Jan 2013 10:09:35 -0700") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eric Schulte Cc: Bastien , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Thomas Alexander Gerds Hello, Eric Schulte writes: > I've just pushed this functionality up to the main branch. To make use > of it add the following to your Emacs config. > > (setq org-babel-hash-show-time t) > > It works for me in some simple tests, and I can confirm that with this > variable set to nil, I get no new failures in the Org-mode test suite, > so it shouldn't introduce any problems. Well, it breaks the parser, somehow. Indeed, it expects from an affiliated keyword such as #+results: (or #+caption for that matter) to have only one secondary value. Sexp representation of these keywords is already very complicated, it will not help to add values ad nauseum. Also, if you use Org time-stamp syntax, at some point, someone will ask the parser to be able to parse it. And it won't. Eventually, it doesn't help to have hash syntax match Org links. This is confusing. Therefore, if this feature really has to be introduced, I suggest, at the very least, to avoid using Org regular syntax for the reference to time. It would also help to blur distinction between the time and the hash string. Perhaps something like the following: #+results[2013-01-30T20:15:37 hash-string]: name Thank you. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou