From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: henry atting Subject: Re: latex code block evaluation Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 11:47:31 +0100 Message-ID: <87liavf7p8.fsf@bye.fritz.box> References: <87mwvc58za.fsf@bye.fritz.box> <86fw133mf5.fsf@somewhere.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45184) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4qvK-0001dH-8b for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 05:47:47 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4qvI-0000wo-RH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 05:47:46 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:46528) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4qvI-0000wc-J4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 05:47:44 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U4qvZ-0000yB-P5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 11:48:01 +0100 Received: from port-92-195-41-245.dynamic.qsc.de ([92.195.41.245]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 11:48:01 +0100 Received: from snd by port-92-195-41-245.dynamic.qsc.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 11:48:01 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Sebastien, "Sebastien Vauban" writes: > Hi Henry, > > henry atting wrote: >> I have this latex code block: >> >> #+begin_src latex :file foo.pdf >> \documentclass{article} >> \begin{document} >> ...some text... >> \end{document} >> #+end_src >> >> After evaluation the resulting file looks like this: >> >> article ...some text... >> >> I do not understand this. As far as I know it is possible to define the >> latex documentclass within a code block. > > Could you be more explicit? Do you want to use that to pass parameters to the > LaTeX backend? If yes, why not using the "#+LaTeX:" directive (not sure > they're still supported with the exact same syntax as before -- I've not yet > merged my documents). And that brings us to the most important question: old > or new exporter? > > Eventually, can you send a real ECM, or your real use case? Ah, I see, I was unclear. In this case I simply want to evalutate this code block with `C-c C-c'. I do not use the orgmode LaTeX exporter, only the HTML exporter. Finally I will create org files with LaTeX code blocks which I will export to HTML. And that's all. HTML export works fine with the old or the new exporter. Though in this case it is not really indispensable I only was wondering why code block evalution does not work as expected. Why is `\documentclass{article}' not recognized properly? > Best regards, > Seb Greetings, henry