From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Abrahamsen Subject: Re: using export filters to emulate multi-column table cells? Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 21:51:16 +0800 Message-ID: <87liap8z3f.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <87sj4zbhy5.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <874nhe94gz.fsf@gmail.com> <871uci9tj7.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87ip5t7mkp.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48014) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U6Le7-0005T8-Jl for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:48:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U6Le5-0002Bl-HW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:48:11 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:47936) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U6Le5-0002BC-9g for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:48:09 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U6LeM-00034s-E3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:48:26 +0100 Received: from 114.250.119.40 ([114.250.119.40]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:48:26 +0100 Received: from eric by 114.250.119.40 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:48:26 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > >> Nicolas Goaziou writes: > >> I'd like to do the same for HTML, but of course the brackets in the >> cookie are escaped by the time this filter kicks in. Would you recommend >> using a different character to delineate the cookie, or match the >> entities (yuck), or...? > > Honestly, I would match the entities. You get a uniform syntax and, > since filters are for your personal use, you don't have to tell anyone > about the ugliness of the implementation. I'll hold my nose, then. Thanks!