From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Leha Subject: Re: [new exporter] #+TOC in beamer export Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 22:53:42 +0100 Message-ID: <87lia17btl.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> References: <87hakq2dqb.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> <877glltt4x.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60283) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UD02u-0004wN-Ez for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 17:09:17 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UD02t-00045S-3k for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 17:09:16 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:60866) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UCzo3-0007pj-Pg for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 16:53:55 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UCzoM-0002cr-4v for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 22:54:14 +0100 Received: from vpn-2085.gwdg.de ([134.76.2.85]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 22:54:14 +0100 Received: from andreas.leha by vpn-2085.gwdg.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 22:54:14 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Nicolas, Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > Andreas Leha writes: > >> from a recent thread I learned about #+TOC (there's always something new >> to learn about org mode). >> >> I'd like to use it in a beamer document. Here I find it hard to use >> because it introduces its own frame. >> >> My question basically is: How is this supposed to be used in a beamer >> doc? >> (And would it not be easier if it did not introduce its own frame?) > > It seems useful to keep frame around TOC generated from toc:t option. > But we could remove it from TOC generated from #+TOC keywords. > Thanks for taking this further. Indeed, for the toc:t triggered TOC the frame is absolutely useful. So, I like your suggestion very much. Best, Andreas