From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Allan Webber Subject: Re: agenda: personal priority for today Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:17:24 -0500 Message-ID: <87li8qnfgb.fsf@earlgrey.lan> References: <51655C8A.4070806@haas-heinrich.de>, , <87mwt60z8j.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38164) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UQ4GJ-00087w-Vm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:17:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UQ4GI-0006BJ-I9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:17:07 -0400 In-reply-to: <87mwt60z8j.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Bastien writes: > "John Wiegley" writes: > >> You'll have to change the positions of the items within the Org file itself. >> It would be great if there was a single key to do this and then very quickly >> update the agenda view. > > This is tempting in imagination but I think the real implementation > would be limited and a bit fragile. > > Limited because you would have to restrict moving around agenda > entries to Org entries of the same level, and a bit fragile because > you'll have to 100% that (folded) entries are not corrupted when moved > around, e.g. from one org agenda file to another. > > So, better to play with something non-interactive and have a property > for sorting in the agenda only. I wonder if we had a property that was basically sorting on very large numbers? When you add something to the agenda and there aren't any sorted items, it creates a property with some median-ish very large number. As you move things up and down on the agenda it sorts in random ranges between the chunks of huge number space per item. This would be a goofy but workable solution?