From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Org clock markers are not consistent with org-clock-history
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 10:48:59 +0200
Message-ID: <87li88e2kk.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
References: <87k3ntt93u.fsf@norang.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44524)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1UUvO3-0005is-QS
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 04:49:13 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1UUvNw-0002dj-1i
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 04:49:11 -0400
Received: from mail-wg0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::234]:56280)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1UUvNv-0002de-Re
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 04:49:03 -0400
Received: by mail-wg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id k13so707565wgh.31
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 01:49:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87k3ntt93u.fsf@norang.ca> (Bernt Hansen's message of "Tue, 23
	Apr 2013 14:06:29 -0400")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bernt Hansen <bernt@norang.ca>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, carsten.dominik@gmail.com

Hi Bernt,

Bernt Hansen <bernt@norang.ca> writes:

> Shouldn't ALL clock markers be treated the same way?

Definitely.

> (Either move them all forward or none of them)

I removed the forward char ugly hack--I cannot reproduce the
error I was seeing before when the user manually inserts some
text right on the marker and modifies it in the wrong direction.

I will try to reproduce the problem later on, but lets use the
clean way for now.

Thanks!

-- 
 Bastien