From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Feng Shu <tumashu@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Override the default class name with a new one.
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 18:42:02 +0800
Message-ID: <87li6dc6th.fsf@news.tumashu-localhost.org>
References: <87hah2wn8y.fsf@news.tumashu-localhost.org>
	<8761xhftwi.fsf@news.tumashu-localhost.org> <87d2rp8370.fsf@pank.home>
	<87k3lxxbqe.fsf@pierrot.dokosmarshall.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34279)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tumashu@gmail.com>) id 1UnRyi-0000wd-VR
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 07:15:39 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tumashu@gmail.com>) id 1UnRyb-0004tT-Vy
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 07:15:36 -0400
Received: from mail-pb0-x22b.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22b]:34005)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tumashu@gmail.com>) id 1UnRyb-0004tE-Nk
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 07:15:29 -0400
Received: by mail-pb0-f43.google.com with SMTP id md12so475627pbc.2
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 04:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tumashu ([110.97.80.149])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ib9sm1902065pbc.43.2013.06.14.04.15.26
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
	(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Fri, 14 Jun 2013 04:15:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from feng by news.tumashu-localhost.org with local (Exim 4.80)
	(envelope-from <tumashu@gmail.com>) id 1UnRSE-0006kt-JN
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 18:42:02 +0800
In-Reply-To: <87k3lxxbqe.fsf@pierrot.dokosmarshall.org> (Nick Dokos's message
	of "Fri, 14 Jun 2013 05:50:17 -0400")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Nick Dokos <ndokos@gmail.com> writes:

> Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:
>
>> Feng Shu <tumashu@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> #+LATEX_CLASS: article
>>> #+LATEX_CLASS_NAME: ctexart
>>
>> I'm not sure this is the right approach. . .  I can certainly see the
>> value of generating classes on the fly, though.  But somehow the
>> proposed syntax just seems to counter-intuitive.  I'm not sure how to
>> overcome this, but perhaps it would be better to allow for an argument
>> to LATEX_CLASS, e.g.
>>
>> (*)   #+LATEX_CLASS: myclass :class-name ctexart.
>>
>
> That was what popped into my head as well - I didn't much care for the
> OP's approach.  Now that I've thought about it some more, I'm not sure I
> like this one much better...
>
>> as e.g. the INCLUDE command.  Of course (*) is somewhat different from
>> how stuff like this is usually handled, cf. e.g. LATEX_CLASS_OPTIONS.
>>
> ...but this sounds a bit more promising: maybe LATEX_CLASS_OPTIONS can
> be eliminated in favor of LATEX_CLASS with arguments:
>
> #+LATEX_CLASS: key :class-name foo :class-options a4paper,12pt

May be we should add this feature too:

#+LaTEX_CLASS: key :class-name foo :class-options+  twoside
#+LaTEX_CLASS: key :class-name foo :class-options-  twoside

>
> where "key" selects from org-latex-classes (and is optional, default
> "article"), class-name is optional and defaults to key (or article if
> key is absent).

--