From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [RFC] Make QUOTE an export keyword instead of an element type Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 09:51:24 +0100 Message-ID: <87lhxn1f1v.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87zjmiyhfd.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwiijt9g.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <6689A23E-E318-4146-8641-BD974CB64C73@gmail.com> <87fvo9y8z7.fsf@gmail.com> <87sis9smaf.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87bnyxxig6.fsf@gmail.com> <87lhxw9mwl.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87wqhfq83t.fsf@gmail.com> <87ob2qtpwh.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87ppn542hj.fsf@gmail.com> <878utt17j1.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <878uts4f3y.fsf@gmail.com> <87r47kqm2n.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <874n4g44jy.fsf@gmail.com> <87d2j4qkbs.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87zjm82o9t.fsf@gmail.com> <87vbwv3jlh.fsf@gmail.com> <87ha8d3m32.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87txcc15w7.fsf@gmail.com> <87sirvhpga.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51367) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBh9P-0001wu-Ez for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 03:51:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBh9K-00008t-5G for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 03:51:07 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87sirvhpga.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (Bastien's message of "Thu, 06 Feb 2014 23:00:05 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: Org Mode List , Carsten Dominik Hello, Bastien writes: > I see that turning a commented line is prevented, while turning > several commented lines is allowed. This feels weird. I don't > think we should prevent this. > > What do you think? I don't think there's much point in comparing function's behaviours when acting on a single line or on a region: they are very different. For example, you can break the structure of an example block in the latter case, but not in the former. Anyway, in this particular case, I guess we could consider comments as a stack of one line elements. I added the feature. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou