From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: comment section with latex_header
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 21:17:33 +0100
Message-ID: <87lhijldia.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <olulhipz45z.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de>
	<87d23znv5a.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <55110E84.3060408@roklein.de>
	<87zj72n5xk.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <86d23y3gxi.fsf@example.com>
	<5512A024.5050509@roklein.de> <86k2y4b1gt.fsf@example.com>
	<olur3sbykle.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53428)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1YbECW-00063E-9I
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 16:16:25 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1YbECQ-0003hs-UB
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 16:16:24 -0400
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::195]:48040)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1YbECQ-0003hi-Ei
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 16:16:18 -0400
In-Reply-To: <olur3sbykle.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> (Andreas Leha's message
	of "Thu, 26 Mar 2015 13:06:05 +0000")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Andreas Leha <andreas.leha@med.uni-goettingen.de>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Andreas Leha <andreas.leha@med.uni-goettingen.de> writes:

> FWIW, I agree that COMMENT should be equivalent to individual line # .

I hope you mean it should be equivalent during export only. Otherwise,
it would introduce some serious slowdown as COMMENT can be inherited.

> Sections that should be accessible without being exported get
> the :noexport: tag.
>
> Is there any usecase for COMMENTed sections that is not covered
> by :noexport:?

Babel code from a :noexport: headline is executed. It isn't when in
a COMMENT headline. I think both are useful.

Regards,