From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Lawrence Subject: Re: org-cite and org-citeproc Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 07:39:22 -0700 Message-ID: <87lhibgbfp.fsf@berkeley.edu> References: <87twx5hs2x.fsf@berkeley.edu> <871tk560p3.fsf@delle7240.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> <878uedgeuq.fsf@berkeley.edu> <874mp0u8n5.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33056) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YdJoW-0004dY-4h for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 10:40:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YdJoS-0006zv-5G for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 10:40:16 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:55758) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YdJoR-0006zi-V7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 10:40:12 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YdJoK-0002P0-9k for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 16:40:04 +0200 Received: from c-67-169-117-151.hsd1.ca.comcast.net ([67.169.117.151]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 16:40:04 +0200 Received: from richard.lawrence by c-67-169-117-151.hsd1.ca.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 16:40:04 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Rasmus writes: > Richard Lawrence writes: > >> I don't really know anything about the ODT format, though. My code >> more-or-less blindly pastes Pandoc-generated XML into the document >> during Org ODT export. Can someone who knows more about the format take >> a look at the file and see if there is some subtle problem I'm not >> noticing? > > I can't test your code 'cause I, for personal/silly reasons, refuse to > spend any more dealing with compiling Haskell. Fair enough. :) > That being said, my gut feeling is that you have to define the data > elsewhere. > > For example, to add a (sub)title to a odt document the field/keyword is > defined in a file different from contents.xml and will just not be printed > if used in contents.xml only. Hmm. But the citations are all just represented as nodes...surely that doesn't have to be defined elsewhere? I am now guessing that the problem is that you can't have one inside another. Each paragraph is wrapped in a , but so are the citations within it...maybe that is not correct and so LibreOffice doesn't like it. > Also, the bibliography is not "correct" in the sense that if it was setup > in the right semantic way, it would be gray in LO, like the TOC. Do you know what other markup is required in this case? It looks like maybe the TOC is gray because it is marked with a "text:protected" attribute, or maybe because it has an associated "OrgIndexSection" style? Thanks! Best, Richard