From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Marking/highlighting text temporarily Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 13:48:38 +0200 Message-ID: <87lhgmrtrd.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87a8xyrn39.fsf@pinto.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> <87bnieufde.fsf@mbork.pl> <87zj5xewsp.fsf@pinto.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> <87iockmyxy.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87bnicshhc.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87r3r57zre.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87lhhb2uot.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87oam7p6a7.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87mw1r865s.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <878udahabq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87pp6m5qy4.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <873837gyn9.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87d21yw6m6.fsf@pank.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59162) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YuJVr-000675-G7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2015 07:47:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YuJVq-0001Eg-L3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2015 07:47:15 -0400 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:36228) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YuJVq-0001Cy-Ei for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2015 07:47:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87d21yw6m6.fsf@pank.eu> (rasmus@gmx.us's message of "Mon, 18 May 2015 11:57:21 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Rasmus Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Rasmus writes: > While we have opening and closing tags for formatting (e.g. bold), I > dislike the above. It seems like asking for trouble; it would seem one > could easily loose track and delete one end of the tag and not the other. > IOW: [@:ID1]... [@:ID2]...[@]...[@] seems like asking for trouble as I > could easily delete an opening pair. We can implement a function in org-annotate.el to remove an annotation. You don't need to do it by hand. > But note that I am more interested in an inline noting/todo functionality > as opposed to annotation functionality. Inline noting is Text[@:1][@] * Annotations [@:1:] My note. I don't know what is a TODO functionality since you suggest to not make it appear in the agenda. > Also, for annotation, would it not be annoying, in review session say, to > have the notes so "far away" from the text? Perhaps not with the right > helping tools. Again, not with proper tooling, e.g, remote editing like footnotes. Regards,