From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Footnote attributes Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 09:42:07 +0100 Message-ID: <87lh7spn6o.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44530) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aJdS3-0001S8-S4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 03:40:16 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aJdS0-0000vX-K0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 03:40:15 -0500 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:43358) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aJdS0-0000tb-Dj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 03:40:12 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Thomas S. Dye's message of "Wed, 13 Jan 2016 15:20:48 -1000") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: "Thomas S. Dye" Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Thomas S. Dye writes: > The following ECM yields a blank footnote in LaTeX export. > > ,-------------------------- > | * Footnote test > | > | This is text.[fn:1] > | > | * Footnotes > | #+attr_latex: :offset 0in > | [fn:1] A footnote. > `-------------------------- > > If I remove the attr_latex line, all is well. I expect the footnote to > work, regardless of the attr_latex line. Fixed. Thank you. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou