From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: Bug: linum-mode + org-indent-mode cursor movement problems
 [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ /usr/share/emacs/25.2/lisp/org/)]
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 11:32:04 +0100
Message-ID: <87lgj3ri6z.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <2478d6d8-e0f0-b5d2-f6d1-5a3a694a5042@comcast.net>
	<87po8gtu5h.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<8fc8441a-2532-7933-aeb8-e638976acc77@comcast.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52844)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1eG1kO-00022q-Fp
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 06:57:21 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1eG1kN-0008KJ-Rm
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 06:57:20 -0500
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::195]:34307)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>)
	id 1eG1kN-0008K8-M3
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 06:57:19 -0500
In-Reply-To: <8fc8441a-2532-7933-aeb8-e638976acc77@comcast.net> (Tom
	Schutter's message of "Fri, 17 Nov 2017 16:18:48 -0700")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Tom Schutter <t.schutter@comcast.net>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Tom Schutter <t.schutter@comcast.net> writes:

> But how long will we wait for Emacs 26?

I don't know. It could be less long than waiting for someone to fix it,
though.

Anyway, I think the issue is on the Emacs C-side of code. Try playing
with

  (vertical-motion '(2.0 . -1))

and 

  (vertical-motion '(2.0 . 1))

in the buffer, for example from the "1" in "1234". They give different
results.

You may want to ask you question on Emacs Devel mailing list.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou                                                0x80A93738