From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [RFC] Moving "manual.org" into core Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 17:02:42 +0100 Message-ID: <87lggp6fvh.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87bmhooaj9.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87tvveqi7u.fsf@bzg.fr> <87wp0a57i5.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41978) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1edeYi-0007Ro-TY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 11:03:00 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1edeYd-0003gK-CH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 11:02:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Kaushal Modi's message of "Mon, 22 Jan 2018 15:30:32 +0000") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Kaushal Modi Cc: Bastien Guerry , Achim Gratz , Org Mode List Hello, Kaushal Modi writes: > I'd prefer "begin_src org". When these manuals are converted to HTML, we > can use syntax highlighting to format comments, etc in Org snippets. I > think it's good to retain the meta data that that is not an arbitrary block > of text, but Org data. Can you please revert to "begin_src org"? "manual.org" is not meant to be exported to HTML through "ox-html", but using Texinfo itself. AFAIK, Texinfo does not highlight specially Org syntax, so using "begin_src org" is not very important for export. Moreover, the advantage of using "begin_example" instead is: 1. we can use fixed-width for one-liners, 2. Org fontification for source blocks can be sometimes misleading, as you sometimes cannot what is an example and what is not. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou 0x80A93738