From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Tasks performed on a certain day Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 18:34:16 +0100 Message-ID: <87lg63cw2v.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87sh0efgs3.fsf@llwynog.ekleog.org> <878t25g09o.fsf@llwynog.ekleog.org> <87y3a5dsuw.fsf@llwynog.ekleog.org> <87tvktglg3.fsf@mbork.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33457) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gKoCH-0006cs-Px for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Nov 2018 12:34:26 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gKoCE-00078h-3K for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Nov 2018 12:34:25 -0500 Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197]:57113) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gKoCD-00078M-Oz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Nov 2018 12:34:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Samuel Wales's message of "Wed, 7 Nov 2018 18:31:09 -0700") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Samuel Wales Cc: Eric S Fraga , Ken Mankoff , Leo Gaspard , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Samuel Wales writes: > i also call them event. > > i have code below that shows them in agenda as "Event:" in their own face. > > i think there was a proposal a while back to have them be in the > planning line [the one just after the header] as EVENT: <...> along > with closed, scheduled, and deadline. i kinda liked that proposal > [great for 3rd party tools, maybe even a bit faster, consistency] but > it never went anywhere. :] It is tempting to add a new planning keyword, indeed. Agenda generation would be much faster (looking for timestamps everywhere is the slowest part of agenda generation). However, I think some users need to have multiple so-called events in the same headline, e.g., for irregularly repeating tasks. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou