From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id uNM9E1h2VF+KLgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 06 Sep 2020 05:40:40 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id YCAbD1h2VF98QAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 06 Sep 2020 05:40:40 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF34F9404C4 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 05:40:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:49850 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kEnPq-0001Fn-DY for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 06 Sep 2020 01:40:38 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58534) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kEnPB-0001Fe-8q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Sep 2020 01:39:57 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x62a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::62a]:33663) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kEnP8-00063j-Is; Sun, 06 Sep 2020 01:39:56 -0400 Received: by mail-pl1-x62a.google.com with SMTP id h2so3002919plr.0; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 22:39:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :date:mime-version; bh=7PQ4tAtsz+Xe0tYa96bqP/lRxGbu1sOBdeIM6ydkY4E=; b=g8FmO7f+A9pdabmF2Eb6x3I+ux8W3XA5YnkRaDssz2EdIPtJkWvuYMTX/Ah9NE+I0Q BurPzfELy35NFiZdSGEc1fWzjL2XBqurl8dJ7ImwsC2ex/mrp8PMm5/1VIkRdGddu5D3 7OlcGQaP93FSl+OzhOPUvVqh+3fbAjTd5wdNE/RXX4ScmB98mVZDCkCtwlb/9TKeEo5n U3fzXdApv/suMv3nf7KPwGmfnaQj4W9uputcwlQ2TjE0Jvd7VNSdMpzEbsuPkXILJkEI 8Q/3rTr/r0Socy/8zJpAlJridKzguALTpZfhczTPIM1duM9gHqAp7WGmXpaCOw3eNGEm ZNPg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:message-id:date:mime-version; bh=7PQ4tAtsz+Xe0tYa96bqP/lRxGbu1sOBdeIM6ydkY4E=; b=WJiWmLgB2+iLg7VFmx6t6p1R9BFVHxjcF5ETtHuk1aDwAu0hSd79fpYD6kltjqQJtn SZNmy/4RoPQsskl/akMAqvIaE6SQ/Fyx41B9ytBsv7/owZkSNGWJww2SYOJbES7GSwbS qJuGYqwUHjJ1pRhI6Y17a6xZ4XPCAe4TSyYc11hxBhGUBCpvvXo6XLCdMcOjy+0R5aKK EoLrs66pLEZ1OsXJZu9gVD1nmjtvFq4nDN94PwIhdfZlD7Tr8DgNZhua2BrJYf4WJ5L/ ZoMdm1HCUXatizlEpyBNf0j0E15GG987g8bK3un/KL78v0zc5cvgy53AiqZkYH1yUdD9 vkSw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530S1A1coAB3TXs271IVsiiAEY7ic2zmq8W9eBVG9bPIhsuwtIXv mfJbxH3DV+UK7iEbww99AmZSS5+7T3aydg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzjvfov2WQxNCMSQeaYLeTslTuiLVzwLHftalapW+/TphdPFMgc7D+uNOM3uxW9iHQ9+jZwwg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:364c:: with SMTP id nh12mr14475846pjb.182.1599370792201; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 22:39:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (180-150-91-8.b4965b.per.nbn.aussiebb.net. [180.150.91.8]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u14sm11049130pfc.203.2020.09.05.22.39.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 05 Sep 2020 22:39:51 -0700 (PDT) References: <875zaxlmeo.fsf@gmail.com> <87o8nxeg19.fsf@gmail.com> <87r1rg8ywq.fsf@gnu.org> <87pn70fd7p.fsf@gmail.com> <87blijo4dt.fsf@gnu.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.1 From: TEC To: Bastien Subject: Re: WIP: Org-plot work In-reply-to: <87blijo4dt.fsf@gnu.org> Message-ID: <87lfhnfopo.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2020 13:39:47 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::62a; envelope-from=tecosaur@gmail.com; helo=mail-pl1-x62a.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: org-mode-email , Eric Schulte , Mario Frasca Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=g8FmO7f+; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.09 X-TUID: av9rVRAyTkbH Bastien writes: > Sure, please go ahead. Will do! :) > Great -- because I know Mario shared a lot of proposals, many of which > where probably ignored or dismissed because the patches did not follow > our conventions closely enough (despite his notable efforts). > > It is of foremost importance that we stick to these conventions: they > help reduce the burden of Org maintainance. But it is a pity that we > lose contributions because contributors cannot follow them and find it > difficult to do so. > > So, be free to both cooperate on making org-plot.el more useful! Thanks. I suspect my work will need reworking to fit, but as long as people are willing to point out what needs changing, I'm willing to take a look at it :D > Also, org-plot.el would do better with a maintainer - would you like > to step in? Simply on the basis that I'm actively interested in the functionality - I'd be happy to sign up for this. As long as you don't mind someone a bit green being assigned (I'm yet to use Emacs for a whole year, but I don't see myself stopping any time soon!). All the best, Timothy.