Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> writes:

> Mehmet Tekman <mtekman89@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Okay, I will definitely need to refactor my patches then, but I'm
>> quite happy with the state of my current patch branch, so it will
>> be an additional patch instead of a brand new set of patches
>> I think.
>
> It has been a while since the most recent message in this thread.
> May I know if you need any further help with the patch?
>

Hey, thanks for reaching out.

No, I know what to do -- it's just finding the time to do it that is
proving difficult.

I made some small edits a few months ago, to reform the header arguments
so that tangle actions would be encoded in the `:tangle-params' header
and would largely leave the `:tangle' header alone… but when I tested
it, it was failing all tests for reasons I wasn't to sure about.

Here is the current state of my header-reform branch: