From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Olson Subject: Re: Re: [David O'Toole] Fwd: Re: org-publish future ? Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 10:38:45 -0400 Message-ID: <87k67utklm.fsf@tuxtanker.mwolson.org> References: <5a66e8bc561ad58f8ec11eb9d01b2e97@science.uva.nl> <87wtbutmnt.fsf@tuxtanker.mwolson.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0413754539==" Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fnchm-0003uM-Iq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jun 2006 10:38:50 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fnchk-0003tE-6h for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jun 2006 10:38:49 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fnchk-0003t8-0y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jun 2006 10:38:48 -0400 Received: from [128.210.5.246] (helo=mailhub246.itcs.purdue.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1Fncp7-0007sm-Uf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jun 2006 10:46:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Carsten Dominik's message of "Tue, 6 Jun 2006 16:17:57 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org --===============0413754539== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Carsten Dominik writes: > Yes, this is certainly true. ascii-to-xxx converters can certainly > help you to write your first LaTeX document. However, they don't > encourage to grow into that language at all, so to some extend they > are a dead end. I disagree. It would give people an excellent foundation that they can build upon, since they can examine the output from that publishing routine to learn LaTeX. When they come across limitations of the current LaTeX publishing implementation, they will search for supplemental information. Don't get me wrong: I'm not proposing that anyone actually implement this for Org, I'm just defending the hypothetical existence of such a publisher. =2D-=20 Michael Olson -- FSF Associate Member #652 -- http://www.mwolson.org/ Interests: Emacs Lisp, text markup, protocols -- Jabber: mwolson_at_hcoop.n= et /` |\ | | | IRC: mwolson on freenode.net: #hcoop, #muse, #PurdueLUG |_] | \| |_| Project involvement: Emacs, Muse, Planner, ERC, EMMS --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEhZN5+1Ho2POo0xkRAn+aAJ45wy0SMRyjqPn3iTTLV/nv1yTjTQCaAmMC 9YpoyTWjb0L+IZvDFIWyyAs= =zm9n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- --===============0413754539== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode --===============0413754539==--