From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bernt Hansen <bernt@norang.ca>
Subject: Re: Return on a task behaves like TAB
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 08:18:01 -0500
Message-ID: <87k585owdy.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca>
References: <87eiyeyqzw.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca>
	<zf.upnd4dxjkzb.fsf@zeitform.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LV47O-0005Y4-Nt
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 08:18:10 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LV47K-0005Xq-02
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 08:18:09 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54417 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LV47J-0005Xn-SF
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 08:18:05 -0500
Received: from mho-02-bos.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.179]:57822)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <bernt@norang.ca>) id 1LV47J-0005WF-J6
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 08:18:05 -0500
In-Reply-To: <zf.upnd4dxjkzb.fsf@zeitform.de> (Ulf Stegemann's message of
	"Thu\, 05 Feb 2009 10\:23\:20 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Ulf Stegemann <ulf-news@zeitform.de>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Ulf Stegemann <ulf-news@zeitform.de> writes:

> Hi Bernt,

Hi Ulf!

>
> Bernt Hansen <bernt@norang.ca> wrote:
>
>> ...
>> ** Some Task...
>> ** Another task...
>> ...
>>
>> and I want to add detail at the end of 'Some Task'.  What I used to do
>> was just put the point at the beginning of the line for ** Another Task
>> and then hit RETURN to insert a blank line and move up to it to add
>> detail.
>
> just as a side note: wouldn't it be better to use C-o (`open-line')
> instead of RET (`newline')?  This would leave the cursor probably where
> you want it to be without the need for an additional C-p.

Yes it probably would - I wasn't aware of that :)  Thanks.

-Bernt