From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mikael Fornius Subject: Diary sexps in agenda Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:29:10 +0100 Message-ID: <87k57l8kqx.fsf_-_@abc.se> References: <87wsbm8n0i.fsf@abc.se> <87skma8hkg.fsf@abc.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LaSdK-0006dP-Lt for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 05:29:26 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LaSdI-0006cQ-2d for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 05:29:25 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57611 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LaSdH-0006cB-QX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 05:29:23 -0500 Received: from violet.abc.se ([62.80.200.155]:59702) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LaSdH-0003cH-9f for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 05:29:23 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87skma8hkg.fsf@abc.se> (Mikael Fornius's message of "Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:25:35 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org (The patch is wrong, I had misunderstood, as I suspected, sorry.) The problem was that I used < and > around the diary sexp when you apparently should not. You can but then the line after the sexp is not showed in the agenda. It works correct if %%(...) is at beginning of line, with no <> braces. But I first only knew of (info "(org) timestamps") that says that you shound surround with <>. I later found the page (info "(org) Weekly/Daily agenda") who says not to, this maybe needs to be updated? Or is this the intended behavior? I think would best if agenda could handle both cases nicely. If you think that it should be so I can give it another try, beware. :-) Thanks! -- Mikael Fornius