From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Riedy Subject: Re: File local variables and export? Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 11:15:02 -0400 Message-ID: <87k54vbmyx.fsf@sparse.dyndns.org> References: <878wlcfzr0.fsf@sparse.dyndns.org> <0BC5E66D-AA3F-4D43-B830-E36C2EFFB434@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M1MOK-0000Sl-SD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2009 11:17:08 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M1MOG-0000Re-97 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2009 11:17:08 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45231 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M1MOG-0000Ra-5m for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2009 11:17:04 -0400 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:52230) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M1MOF-0001xx-Sn for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2009 11:17:03 -0400 Received: from a.mail.sonic.net ([64.142.16.245]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M1MOD-0006cb-Td for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2009 11:17:02 -0400 Received: from NaN.local.sparse.yi.org (misc-148-78-88-138.pool.starband.net [148.78.88.138]) (authenticated bits=0) by a.mail.sonic.net (8.13.8.Beta0-Sonic/8.13.7) with ESMTP id n45FGkwp025800 for ; Tue, 5 May 2009 08:16:50 -0700 In-Reply-To: <0BC5E66D-AA3F-4D43-B830-E36C2EFFB434@gmail.com> (Carsten Dominik's message of "Tue, 5 May 2009 10:40:16 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org And Carsten Dominik writes: >> I can smuggle the value in by adding an entry to >> org-export-plist-vars referring to >> org-export-latex-image-default-option and pulling the value from >> the plist, but that feels incorrect. > > To me it sounds correct, actually. I have added this, and will > add other variables as needed. I was thinking about using file locals to pass arguments along to custom functions... Carrying a central registry feels funny. Why do you prefer org-export-plist-vars? Jason