From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Noorul Islam K M Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] Removes obsolete functions, variable and fix typos. Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:28:31 +0530 Message-ID: <87k4xonr9k.fsf@noorul.maa.corp.collab.net> References: <53821f890911150808y3878b9ama573ddc6b49661c@mail.gmail.com> <53821f890911172308y9d7bb96y8808bb8782c4b764@mail.gmail.com> <4F695DA8-2B7C-44E1-AF2D-6C4C06A2F3AB@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NAgNe-0006Te-9e for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:59:14 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NAgNZ-0006R2-BQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:59:13 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56963 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NAgNZ-0006Qz-56 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:59:09 -0500 Received: from mail-pz0-f181.google.com ([209.85.222.181]:44720) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NAgNY-0005Da-Lp for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:59:08 -0500 Received: by pzk11 with SMTP id 11so613441pzk.14 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:59:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F695DA8-2B7C-44E1-AF2D-6C4C06A2F3AB@gmail.com> (Carsten Dominik's message of "Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:21:29 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: org-mode Mailinglist Carsten Dominik writes: > 4. Because I don't think I have a copyright assignment from you, > so I always need to check if your patch is small enough > (this one is, but please consider signing the paper so that > I can skip this delay step next time) E-mailed assign@gnu.org > > :-) > > Your patch is in the queue, and I will get to it. When I > am rejecting a patch, I usually do that not silently but > explicitly. Okay, thank you! I will keep in mind that unless there is no rejection mail then it is in your queue and I should not be bothered about it. Thanks and Regards Noorul