From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Dunsmore Subject: Re: Bug: tags grouping not working Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 12:03:49 -0600 Message-ID: <87k4hs508q.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> References: <87tygx2ji3.fsf@in-ulm.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33892 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PhnFB-00045U-S2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 13:03:54 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PhnFA-0001PS-6U for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 13:03:53 -0500 Received: from deathroller.dunsmor.com ([98.129.169.48]:40065) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PhnFA-0001PJ-3L for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 13:03:52 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87tygx2ji3.fsf@in-ulm.de> (Benjamin Andresen's message of "Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:36:04 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Benjamin Andresen Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, bastien.guerry@wikimedia.fr Benjamin Andresen writes: > Hey there, > > I've just upgraded to the latest org-mode HEAD and noticed that the tag > behavior changed. (It now sorts entries, except now grouping is broken.) > > This is how it used to work: > (Assume "#+TAGS: { foo(f) bar(b) } quux(q)" for all of this.) > > * Foo :foo: > > now using M-x org-set-tags-command and pressing 'b' will result in: > > * Foo :bar: > > now selecting 'q' in the same prompt will result in: > > * Foo :bar:quux: > > but instead what will happen is: > > * Foo :quux: > > The offending commit is: > commit c7d1e0f997d2aa1043c9cbbf72d03f05195d692e > Author: Bastien Guerry > Date: Tue Jan 18 00:50:32 2011 +0100 > > just reverting that piece of code on the current HEAD makes grouping > work again. > > best regards, > benny > > P.S. Sorry if that has been reported before, I couldn't find any mention > of tags. Also git bisect is handy. Yep, this commit needs to be reverted. See my message about this: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2011-01/msg00942.html Can you do this Bastien?