From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bernt Hansen <bernt@norang.ca>
Subject: Re: Timestamp display behavior in timeline view
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 13:32:31 -0500
Message-ID: <87k4h6beww.fsf@norang.ca>
References: <4D160A33.7080608@mit.edu> <87k4h6yhz0.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33637 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PnxnR-0002jv-Lb
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 13:32:46 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bernt@norang.ca>) id 1PnxnQ-0007Pa-0n
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 13:32:45 -0500
Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.72]:38520)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bernt@norang.ca>) id 1PnxnP-0007Mp-Sh
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 13:32:43 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87k4h6yhz0.fsf@gnu.org> (Bastien's message of "Fri, 11 Feb 2011
	11:37:55 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bastien <bastien.guerry@wikimedia.fr>
Cc: Alex Huang <axh@MIT.EDU>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Bastien <bastien.guerry@wikimedia.fr> writes:

> Hi Alex,
>
> Alex Huang <axh@MIT.EDU> writes:
>
>> 3. current behavior:
>>   ( + is unsurprising, ! is surprising, ? is not sure whether to be
>> surprised)
>>   + entries without time information not displayed
>>   + timestamps without text not displayed
>>   ! entries with timestamps display the text, but not the timestamp
>
> You used this:
>
> * TODO <2010-12-25 Sat 14:40>-<2010-12-25 Sat 14:50> range with todo
>
> which looks weird.
>
> Better to put the timestamp/range on the next line:
>
> * TODO range with todo
>   <2010-12-25 Sat 14:40>-<2010-12-25 Sat 14:50>

Shouldn't these timestamps have two dashes between them?
   <2010-12-25 Sat 14:40>--<2010-12-25 Sat 14:50>
or
   <2010-12-25 Sat 14:40-14:50>

?

-Bernt

>
> You won't get the surprising results you see.
>
> HTH,