Christopher Genovese writes: > Hi Eric, > > Thanks for your note. > >> I would encourage you to begin the FSF assignment process if >> you anticipate potentially contributing more fixes in the >> future. Could you please send a git format-patch version of >> the simple fix to the list so that I might apply it? > > I will begin the FSF assignment process, and I will send a git-format > patch based on the simple fix. (I'll send that tonight.) > Fantastic. > >> I like the idea of introducing a customizable function for >> comment text transformation, however ... rather perhaps we >> should just leave the default value of this function as >> simple as possible and allow users to customize it .... > > That makes sense, and I like the way you did it. In particular, > I absolutely agree that the org-babel-trim should be removed > from org-babel-spec-to-string (to allow flexibility in the customization). > Making it the default processor works well, I think. > > Would you like me to submit a separate patch based on this change > or should I include that as part of the patch with the simple fix? > I'll write up this change as it may end up being longer than 10 lines, and if I write it we don't have to wait for your FSF assignment to clear (which can sometimes take months) before applying the patch. In fact... if this attached patch looks good to you (i.e., allows the behavior you originally intended) then please let me know and I'll apply it immediately.