From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: coroa@online.de (Jonas =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B6rsch?=) Subject: Re: AUCTex within org-babel Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:23:22 +0100 Message-ID: <87k43wf5lx.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87ty31csgh.fsf@gmx.com> <874nv1gil3.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:34087) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RvUuP-0007gO-Vn for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:23:42 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RvUuO-0002Mk-OE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:23:37 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:48948) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RvUuO-0002MN-Ed for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:23:36 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RvUuN-0007En-0z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:23:35 +0100 Received: from kafka.exp.univie.ac.at ([131.130.102.14]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:23:34 +0100 Received: from coroa by kafka.exp.univie.ac.at with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:23:34 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org hi riccardo, On Thu, Feb 09 2012, Riccardo Romoli wrote: > if you enter in the AUCTeX buffer (C-c') and than you use the AUCTeX C-c > C-e, you can choose the environment you need in the emacs minibuffer such > as in LaTeX. yes, indeed. and my claim was, that the completion facility of AUCTeX then only shows the environment \begin{document}..\end{document} and not f.ex. figure. but when i tried to verify that claim right now, it curiously seems not to be true any longer. so sorry for the noise, my problem (if it ever was one) is solved. cheers, jonas