From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: org-html: subtree specific footnote references Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 18:26:07 +0200 Message-ID: <87k3xhntuo.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87txxjuysd.fsf@chaos.shergill.su> <87zk7b72dj.fsf@chaos.shergill.su> <818vess2cb.fsf@gmail.com> <871ukk9rla.fsf@chaos.shergill.su> <81bojogrhh.fsf@gmail.com> <87bojoryw9.fsf@chaos.shergill.su> <81r4skf9ef.fsf@gmail.com> <87txx74nqf.fsf@chaos.shergill.su> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47857) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SwyDN-0006Vk-WB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 12:25:39 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SwyDM-0001J5-WE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 12:25:33 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:37654) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SwyDM-0001J1-Pl for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 12:25:32 -0400 Received: by wgbez12 with SMTP id ez12so6285863wgb.30 for ; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 09:25:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87txx74nqf.fsf@chaos.shergill.su> (Suhail Shergill's message of "Mon, 16 Jul 2012 17:31:04 +0000") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Suhail Shergill Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Suhail, I have accepted the patch. I added a TINYCHANGE cookie at the end of the git commit message: this is requested for tiny changes made by people who did not sign the FSF papers. Suhail Shergill writes: > *if* this patch makes sense, i'm willing to submit a patch for > org-e-html.el. The patch makes sense but is still a bit hackish. I accepted it because the functionality is useful in some cases and because it only affects org-html.el, which days are counted. > does anyone have any views? My view is that org-e-html.el should also make sure that we always have unique ids for all the footnotes of the current files, even when we export only part of it. This is not a trivial change though, because org-export.el has to change the way it retrieves the footnote number. Can you have a look at this? > does this patch 'make sense', and is this the right place for it? Yes, it is the right place for such patches. Thanks, -- Bastien