From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: latex export of unnumbered sections
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 21:21:54 +0100
Message-ID: <87k3pmvrtp.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87lia3rrvs.wl%sebastian.hofer@univie.ac.at>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36448)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1UCbtj-0005ne-FW
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 15:22:12 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1UCbtg-0003zT-NL
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 15:22:11 -0500
Received: from mail-we0-x232.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::232]:48605)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1UCbtg-0003zL-He
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 15:22:08 -0500
Received: by mail-we0-f178.google.com with SMTP id u7so3625934wey.37
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 12:22:07 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <87lia3rrvs.wl%sebastian.hofer@univie.ac.at> (Sebastian Hofer's
	message of "Mon, 04 Mar 2013 18:34:15 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Sebastian Hofer <sebastian.hofer@univie.ac.at>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Sebastian Hofer <sebastian.hofer@univie.ac.at> writes:

> Is there a particular reason why unnumbered sections are exported to
> latex including the title in first (optional) argument if there is no
> * present? To clarify a bit: A sectioning structure like
>
> ("\\section{%s}" . "\\section*{%s}")
>
> gives rise to
>
> \section[title]{title}          % numbered section
> \section*{title}                % unnumbered section
>
> If, on the other hand you have something like
>
> ("\\numbered{%s}" . "\\unnumbered{%s}")
>
> you will get
>
> \numbered[title]{title}          % numbered section
> \unnumbered[title]{title}        % unnumbered section
>
> Of course one can easily work around that, but it seems a bit
> inconsistent. So I'm wondering if I am missing something...

Unnumbered headlines cannot have an optional title anymore in master.

Thank you for suggesting this.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou