From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rainer@krugs.de (Rainer M. Krug) Subject: Re: de-tangle function? Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 09:13:24 +0200 Message-ID: <87k3mfbp0r.fsf@krugs.de> References: <87vc60y13d.fsf@krugs.de> <86a9ncxxqp.fsf@somewhere.org> <87txlkmfi1.fsf@pank.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51309) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UiJYI-00027j-D6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 31 May 2013 03:15:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UiJYH-0000gH-5a for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 31 May 2013 03:15:06 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:52091) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UiJYG-0000ef-VN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 31 May 2013 03:15:05 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UiJYG-0004NS-95 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 31 May 2013 09:15:04 +0200 Received: from arn78-1-88-186-171-7.fbx.proxad.net ([88.186.171.7]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 31 May 2013 09:15:04 +0200 Received: from Rainer by arn78-1-88-186-171-7.fbx.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 31 May 2013 09:15:04 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Rasmus writes: > "Sebastien Vauban" > writes: > >>> Does it work reliably? >> >> You need the code blocks to be wrapped into comments for it to work. >> >> Regarding reliability, it does work well on small examples. I remember h= aving >> had really bad results with my huge .emacs file, but hadn't any time to = debug >> the problem -- try to reproduce -- at that time. >> >> So, when you do it, please keep a backup of your original Org file. It's >> safer. >> >> But, if there are bugs, they should be clearly identified, and fixed... > > It not always good at finding its way back into the Org file, and I > found that some of the header arguments didn't 'work properly=C3=B8 for > 'complicated' blocks. I'll see if I can make reproducible examples > later. > > It's definitely a potentially cool feature though. Notice you have to > run it from the tangled file. Absolutely - especially debugging code (in my case R) would be easier. Cheers, Rainer > > =E2=80=93Rasmus =2D-=20 Rainer M. Krug --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRqE2VAAoJENvXNx4PUvmCxNIIALNJnoDedh3arh5curnnVxcx KsyLZBBbzu8LepI/JqDvbIANuzKPZU/QiMvwl9TFrqFZ3DEsGxHfw7aY4Nb1lFib ceGV9Uvrz68tT0TfhxMbnXdkWEveFkn8rEyVGuFdyqI46xz5V6ZVKmJBp4SK7vDR 0PNGrGqfP1rvD5d63UVuUaYMqWHhEZYZLaJJzH2RNJQDEMdT6uE9dYNgSYsRqXcz iz4/JB2hz6Gjsj7ROiN42GBypuYcEv3+W3pT8syxgpaL9XRIap8UHwa8kdKjo7vB 2vBqU/kscE12y04mL+VX4nJT9oRxURGVSpyyw5AXhYekaNH4AZ17ixWhwECMck0= =V1Vr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--