From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stephen Jeffrey Barr <stevejb@uw.edu>
Subject: Re: Is there a way to, in a table, denote an entire column as LaTeX
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 07:39:21 -0800
Message-ID: <87k3goyy52.fsf@uw.edu>
References: <87siw555zx.fsf@planetbarr.com> <87y554xtfw.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36314)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <stevejb@uw.edu>) id 1VdMDz-0006NV-QN
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 10:38:00 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <stevejb@uw.edu>) id 1VdMDu-0001xP-UZ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 10:37:55 -0500
In-reply-to: <87y554xtfw.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Cc: "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

No worries. Thank you for getting back to me.

bzg@gnu.org writes:

> Hi Stephen,
>
> "Stephen J. Barr" <stevejb@uw.edu> writes:
>
>> In a table, is it possible to denote that an entire column is LaTeX
>> markup, rather than using the $$ markup around each expression. 
>>
>> Sample table:
>>
>> |---------+------------------|
>> | Term    | Explanation      |
>> |---------+------------------|
>> | $$x^2$$ | This is a square |
>> | $$x^3$$ | This is a cubic  |
>> |---------+------------------|
>>
>>
>> Is there a better way to do this?
>
> Not that I can think of, sorry...