From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Leha Subject: Re: OpenDocument export Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 22:15:54 +0100 Message-ID: <87k3gcf1f9.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> References: <87ob5of2cr.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34595) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VghnP-0001YS-KT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 16:16:24 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VghnG-0006Dy-Kj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 16:16:19 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:52862) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VghnG-0006DP-EZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 16:16:10 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VghnC-0006Eg-0I for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 22:16:06 +0100 Received: from vpn-2079.gwdg.de ([134.76.2.79]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 22:16:06 +0100 Received: from andreas.leha by vpn-2079.gwdg.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 22:16:06 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Andreas Leha writes: > Hi all, > > since my update just a few minutes ago, I have problems exporting one of > my documents to odt. > > The new behaviour is, that I get asked > ,---- > | Buffer foo.org<2><2> modified; kill anyway? (yes or no) > `---- > > Regardless of my answer after that, a new (empty) buffer is opened, > which has the name > ,---- > | OpenDocument export failed: Lisp nesting exceeds `max-lisp-eval-depth' > `---- > (This shows also up in the *Messages* buffer) > > I am not able to reproduce this with a simpler document and until now I > have not been able to detect the responsible part of the offending > document. > > So, I ask here already -- knowing that I provide very little details -- > in case somebody can already point me to where to search next. > > Any ideas? The second problem is gone now. Do not ask me, what made it go away. I have no clue (no emacs restart, document stayed the same). But the first problem (the question on the modified buffer) still persists. Best, Andreas