From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Leha Subject: Re: Buffer local alias? Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:50:57 +0100 Message-ID: <87k3e1y3ni.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> References: <87a9ey5p50.fsf@alphaville.bos.redhat.com> <87zjmyic0v.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87wqi2xmhh.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> <8661plbnde.fsf@somewhere.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43956) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W3N84-0007z3-9e for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 04:51:26 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W3N7x-0007l2-4l for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 04:51:20 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:41196) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W3N7w-0007ji-Nv for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 04:51:13 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W3N7v-0005mD-E4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:51:11 +0100 Received: from genepi110.genepi.med.uni-goettingen.de ([134.76.140.110]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:51:11 +0100 Received: from andreas.leha by genepi110.genepi.med.uni-goettingen.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:51:11 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello Sebastien, "Sebastien Vauban" writes: > Hello Andreas, > > Andreas Leha wrote: >> The drop of the implicit naming of call lines, for example, was (and >> still will be for some of my files) a bigger issue. > > Could you remind me what's the problem you're talking of? Evaluating a #+call line used to produce a result block named with the name of the called code block and the arguments used. That is not the case any more. Something like (off the top of my head): --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- #+call: foo(bar=1) #+call: foo(bar=2) #+results: foo(bar=1) | the | results | #+results: foo(bar=2) | the | results | --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Now, one has to name the call line to get a named results block. I would not call it a problem, though. The change just meant that I had to introduce a lot of names for call lines in some of my files where I relied on that implicit naming of results. I know, that I have not adapted all affected files of mine. So, if ever I wanted to re-export these, I will need to do some more naming of call lines... All the best, Andreas