From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: [RFC] Move ox-koma-letter into core? Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 20:08:00 +0100 Message-ID: <87k3dt6tm7.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <878uueciku.fsf@gmail.com> <55F46D73-2430-4831-ABE9-D66AE03647E7@gmail.com> <874n50cdnu.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87mwisrrv8.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87k3dwaw98.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87r482wo2k.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87ha8yjzeb.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87eh42wju4.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <874n4yju56.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87a9ep19lr.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35717) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5ggD-0003Os-BK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 14:08:14 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5gg8-0003qO-7C for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 14:08:09 -0500 Received: from mail-we0-x231.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::231]:42624) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5gg7-0003qA-SI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 14:08:04 -0500 Received: by mail-we0-f177.google.com with SMTP id x55so8505918wes.36 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 11:08:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87a9ep19lr.fsf@Rainer.invalid> (Achim Gratz's message of "Tue, 21 Jan 2014 19:19:12 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Achim Gratz Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Achim Gratz writes: > If you'd split > off something like Babel it may very well create a live community, but > fragmenting contrib into separate repos could drain any signs of life > from them. Just to be clear: I'm not suggesting to split each library in contrib/ into its own repository, I'm suggesting to use a separate repo for all Elisp stuff in contrib. -- Bastien