From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: org-table-copy-down incrementor
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 16:11:27 +0200
Message-ID: <87k39gilps.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
References: <26CB62FB-01B3-49F6-A3E2-61FC25825493@oracle.com>
	<87ioq8ym8g.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
	<CALn3zoi5LWVNV__76XcTG7dO7oK3CM9758pPfNaY+zzmEmSg6A@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35030)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1WmklX-0004OI-ON
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 May 2014 10:11:48 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1WmklO-0002g8-Jx
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 May 2014 10:11:39 -0400
Received: from mail-wi0-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22c]:65017)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1WmklO-0002eh-Cp
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 May 2014 10:11:30 -0400
Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id hi2so5974271wib.5
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 20 May 2014 07:11:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CALn3zoi5LWVNV__76XcTG7dO7oK3CM9758pPfNaY+zzmEmSg6A@mail.gmail.com>
	(Michael Brand's message of "Wed, 30 Apr 2014 18:25:17 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Michael Brand <michael.ch.brand@gmail.com>
Cc: Org Mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, Stacey Marshall <stacey.marshall@oracle.com>

Hi Michael,

Michael Brand <michael.ch.brand@gmail.com> writes:

> For me it would be already enough and preferred when the increment
> would be the same as in the two fields above point.

I pushed a change in master for this -- can you please check it works
as expected for you?

Thanks for this suggestion!  (A lot easier than other routes likes
using a dedicated #+TBLINC line.)

Best,

-- 
 Bastien