From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: Automatic ordered lists with "intelligent decimalization"?
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2014 15:58:08 +0200
Message-ID: <87k38syg7j.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <CAFAhFSX_5oxroCN_YPQyhYFWaHY_X5zb5eYFtR2TO3_oXofvwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59190)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1WtH7t-0002Vm-FH
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jun 2014 09:57:51 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1WtH7j-0001AP-Bu
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jun 2014 09:57:41 -0400
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::195]:45106)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1WtH7j-0001AH-5e
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jun 2014 09:57:31 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAFAhFSX_5oxroCN_YPQyhYFWaHY_X5zb5eYFtR2TO3_oXofvwQ@mail.gmail.com>
	(Lawrence Bottorff's message of "Sat, 7 Jun 2014 08:52:52 -0500")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Lawrence Bottorff <borgauf@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Lawrence Bottorff <borgauf@gmail.com> writes:

> I've seen explanations all around this issue, but nothing specific to the
> question: Can you create so-called *ordered* list entries automatically,
> i.e., just with M-ret and  M-left/right? 

[...]

> I want to create a hierarchy of list items which are numbered, with proper
> "decimalization" for the subtree(s):
>
> 1. thing-1
> 1.1. thing-1-1
> 1.2. thing-1-2
> 1.2.1. thing-1-2-1

No, you cannot.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou