From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Aaron Ecay <aaronecay@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: :noweb no-export and syntax highlighting upon export to html
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 14:45:34 +0000
Message-ID: <87k2pwv71t.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87si4kk75o.fsf@snow.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33913)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <aaronecay@gmail.com>) id 1ZuLnJ-00053i-TP
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 09:45:42 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <aaronecay@gmail.com>) id 1ZuLnF-0005Bj-FN
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 09:45:41 -0500
Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]:34553)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <aaronecay@gmail.com>) id 1ZuLnF-0005BP-0M
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 09:45:37 -0500
Received: by wmnn186 with SMTP id n186so16218718wmn.1
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 06:45:36 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <87si4kk75o.fsf@snow.nl>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Joost Helberg <joost@snow.nl>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi Joost,

Org=E2=80=99s html export relies on the syntax of the source block being va=
lid
in the block=E2=80=99s language, for the corresponding emacs major mode to
highlight it properly.  In general, I wouldn=E2=80=99t rely on it behaving
properly in the presence of unexpanded noweb references.  That said...

2015ko azaroak 5an, Joost Helberg-ek idatzi zuen:
>=20
> ls,
>=20
> In the org-code below syntax highlighting in both code-blocks in the
> emacs-buffer is fine, but the html-export only works nice in case of
> using :noweb yes, the no-export option screws up syntax highlighting in
> the html-output (two screenshots included).
>=20
> I understood that htmlize is used for html-export and that it honours
> the faces in the emacs-buffer. It seems as if htmlize doesn't do this
> after encountering the '>>' token.

Your example works fine for me on latest org master.  Can you send your
org version?  (M-x org-version)  What happens if you insert the code for
t1 into an sh-mode buffer: is it highlighted as expected?

--=20
Aaron Ecay