From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: Something like #+BIND but for the destination buffer
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 18:52:52 +0100
Message-ID: <87k29xv897.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <CA+7KPGf3W-L-_rnLT00PdBrBGHDDEaD8Wts9_LAuyJzk3L_=sQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<874m1krwk5.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<CA+7KPGfAN=g1LzfVJ3pxPSj3Tn1yH62h7SnQSaCiBEJ73-HmDA@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.OSX.2.20.1701030853570.725@charles-berrys-macbook.local>
	<CA+7KPGfyUoFZdktJaL=Jg_NdfX0u5yJFqHd2=OV2kF3KfY2bYw@mail.gmail.com>
	<877f5xaedv.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<CA+7KPGeE2fAQ+h5NZq38PM3ADTHhKhJ9E5HK9smidz9zVmUFdA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41254)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1cSSVi-0004E2-EQ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 12:53:03 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1cSSVd-0003K4-Ki
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 12:53:02 -0500
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:56112)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>)
	id 1cSSVd-0003Jv-EK
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 12:52:57 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CA+7KPGeE2fAQ+h5NZq38PM3ADTHhKhJ9E5HK9smidz9zVmUFdA@mail.gmail.com>
	(Jonas Bernoulli's message of "Sat, 14 Jan 2017 18:47:40 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Jonas Bernoulli <jonasbernoulli@gmail.com>
Cc: Org-Mode mailing list <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, "Charles C. Berry" <ccberry@ucsd.edu>

Jonas Bernoulli <jonasbernoulli@gmail.com> writes:

> I did notice myself that the two-space indentation for blocks that are part
> of a list element are reserved and also that one can do what you are
> suggesting here to keep the code-block as part of the list item while at
> the same time not get those two extra spaces. (By the way, I don't like
> that work-around.)

This is not really a work-around. If we want to preserve indentation, as
"-i" implies, we need a fixed point to compute it. Here it is column 0.

> However for me that's what happened for example blocks only. For source
> blocks I got an additional five spaces, for which I found no explanation.
> (The only indentation in the Org source before the code-block lines are the
> two part-of-a-list-element spaces.)

Could you show an ECM?

Regards,