From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tim Stewart Subject: Re: [PATCH] org.el: Fix indentation in lists after blocks with special env Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2017 21:52:49 -0400 Message-ID: <87k24i3rbi.fsf@stoo.org> References: <8760gw5gix.fsf@stoo.org> <878tlsowwy.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87y3tr8slz.fsf@stoo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53689) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dKEXJ-0001cQ-Sy for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 21:52:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dKEXG-0002fR-LE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 21:52:57 -0400 Received: from mail-qt0-x235.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::235]:35420) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dKEXG-0002fF-Eu for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 21:52:54 -0400 Received: by mail-qt0-x235.google.com with SMTP id w1so111170823qtg.2 for ; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 18:52:52 -0700 (PDT) In-reply-to: <87y3tr8slz.fsf@stoo.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Tim Stewart writes: > Hi, > > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > >> Hello, >> >> Tim Stewart writes: >> >>> * lisp/org.el (org--get-expected-indentation): Fix indentation within >>> lists after blocks that support a special editing environment. >>> >>> Testing shows that the indentation within lists is incorrect after >>> `example-block', `export-block', and `source-block'. The logic falls >>> through and makes a recursive call to `org-get-indentation' which >>> results in an indent to the same level as the last line of the block's >>> contents. >> >> Thank you. Could you provide an ECM, however? I'm not able to reproduce >> it so far. > > Huh. I just tried to minimally reproduce and was unable to do so. Then > I tried my standard configuration (without this patch) and was still > unable to reproduce! To keep my sanity, I'm telling myself this may > have been fixed in the meantime. > > There were several others at my workplace experiencing the issue--I will > have them remove the patch and retest in their environments. I > apologize, I should have tried to provide an ECM from the beginning! > > Thank you, and I'll let you know what I find, I checked and my coworkers checked and it seems this issue was, in fact, resolved outside of my changes. I have not tracked down the change that provided the actual fix. Thanks, -TimS -- Tim Stewart ----------- Mail: tim@stoo.org Matrix: @tim:stoo.org