From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add :eval only-manual to babel blocks Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 18:07:54 +0200 Message-ID: <87k194ad2d.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87v9srdcqe.fsf@gmail.com> <87h849b4z6.fsf@gmail.com> <87r23d9dqn.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <878spk7whv.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58624) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iKlqD-0000Ie-0J for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 12:08:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iKlqB-0002vS-G3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 12:08:00 -0400 Received: from relay10.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.230]:60875) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iKlqB-0002u7-9d for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 12:07:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: <878spk7whv.fsf@gmail.com> (Ken Mankoff's message of "Wed, 16 Oct 2019 13:36:28 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Ken Mankoff Cc: Org Mailing List Hello, Ken Mankoff writes: > Can you provide a more obvious hint? :) I don't have enough time to help you more on that, sorry. I didn't even look closely to the issue you're encountering. Hopefully, someone else on the ML can provide guidance on it. > I've read the documentation on called-interactively-p but have not had > success yet with that function. The bottom of that doc string suggests > this is not an appropriate use for it. Indeed. > I've read the manual part on "Distinguish Interactive Calls"[1] but > working through those examples I can't get deeper called functions to > know if the nth-parent was called interactively or not. IMO, this is what you shouldn't try to do: mess with the call stack. This sounds like a wrong approach to the problem. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou