From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 0LOlOhzlUl9TCAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 01:08:44 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id wJV9NhzlUl+GWAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 01:08:44 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46876940366 for ; Sat, 5 Sep 2020 01:08:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:52358 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kEMh8-0008Pr-Sw for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 21:08:42 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43568) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kEMgg-0008Pg-M9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 21:08:14 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1043.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::1043]:51238) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kEMge-0007uy-T2; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 21:08:14 -0400 Received: by mail-pj1-x1043.google.com with SMTP id a9so763869pjg.1; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 18:08:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=JINeqpNpzY/QPbRyhS1LVjxeDJCbLph+OwRba4KQ2to=; b=Yyhdl1gyfmq+r64xLsxk3WYMRRHElRvQpgXkZQQWltkX1Ntkwu83+f6luNId1lXbMS 36JDPX4l2SSEWBF5qwj5R/nmXJemEc9ZjGv19ZsrFPNHZtIi8baa0BviVGYvhdsKy9tj SXQWS4A5/A3OPrcJZBjcYYbek6ALl3FtUA907KIsiKf1L5KXksxMp6IxV73VObolzXS/ A7ztASWk/VV1oXwzDPz0cKm/CGUYwtXOmzA+hS8WSLxcnB/57FwDQIZ+11rPYw5Ng/uk 1fbHN+EJ+uzOLhqOasCUjcQcj9DN40u1pcHaC/ynzwMfvnxJndL13uBr5NrWpshRGgIA lpoQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=JINeqpNpzY/QPbRyhS1LVjxeDJCbLph+OwRba4KQ2to=; b=l2VLj1mKJ+oVLGGV8MSK5CepuJtEPUmDLIz78R4s1l4EIjEogOG0O41xHIRK5y4fQe P5rRcE89Wd/E3M08VH7NcDSB6x1IGcwszbinwc0AqCEPKgs4C7h9HIShmWzk7s22Gcc/ oC62g4zeOzcVcEFkhAGVjQ8KrbRwQgAAtBBK5iQbB3A3xkOctgj/qvnmpYSDKW+5pL0p PNn7H52UZYePSXH2eY3dC1B+3JmjljRWPs1Us+hWoL3EPkgau36AX5ako63pc/uOnhft 21paf38G24+sEi8JUYTZKBAco/GjjUjZgbQtN7yAFwia1+Y3XUroI8LQ02im7iILctar Nq2w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532fLl3NQMjPL75sNHTvwxW4Sk5ZiyAiwL8WaveSb8GKEmbVzGUn 4sEdOrhDc39cxDv7Ekzhf1B32fDEAEE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwxeCxkTDp+2L9SSAzbfMmYUYHuCf8OMAWxb8Cuwx4orBFL+nU8csxtu2CFl0stj16jMQsBRA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b108:: with SMTP id q8mr10929127plr.161.1599268090157; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 18:08:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (199-83-220-90.PUBLIC.monkeybrains.net. [199.83.220.90]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v17sm7606914pfn.24.2020.09.04.18.08.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 04 Sep 2020 18:08:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Jack Kamm To: Bastien Subject: Re: [PATCH] ob-python.el: Fix issue with sessions on remote machines In-Reply-To: <871rjhq31a.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87h7t16red.fsf@pc.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87zh6syqym.fsf@gmail.com> <875z9c93tv.fsf@gmail.com> <871rjhq31a.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2020 18:08:08 -0700 Message-ID: <87k0x9qbd3.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::1043; envelope-from=jackkamm@gmail.com; helo=mail-pj1-x1043.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Christian Vanderwall , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Yyhdl1gy; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.71 X-TUID: 2U5o1hlEGCC7 Hi Bastien, > Would you be okay to add yourself as the ob-python.el maintainer? Sure, I've added myself as maintainer to the header of ob-python.el. > I suggest we have a policy that "Org maintainer(s)" have the last > words on everything in Org's core, but that individual maintainers, > when known from the header section of an Elisp file, have the very > "first look" on bug reports and feature suggestions. > > WDYT? I'm trying to review ob-python related patches and mail as I notice them, and monitor the list for mails with "python" in the subject, though some may fall through the cracks occasionally, especially when my workload is heavy. Should I merge in patches to ob-python.el, as I did here? Or should I simply review them, and let the core maintainers merge them in after review? Jack