From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id 0AAgKBKB1mNIJQEAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 29 Jan 2023 15:22:10 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id UHLZJxKB1mNgWgAAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 29 Jan 2023 15:22:10 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B33335FEE for ; Sun, 29 Jan 2023 15:22:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pM8Yb-0001Sa-2i; Sun, 29 Jan 2023 09:21:21 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pM8YO-0001FS-Hf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2023 09:21:14 -0500 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pM8YJ-0002Ra-05 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2023 09:21:07 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FF552402A8 for ; Sun, 29 Jan 2023 15:20:52 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1675002055; bh=n5IhcAQ2mSfX3jkIv148FtaPv2eYNZoqmowURod2eC0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=hnji/jkASo/kFsBC6F85d603GTcbVtAbjz7+w7A2HIJSU4OH/JpxefTpmYx1OOY00 pl02U56OuPzASIVeN1RK6Zs7A1MGDKRE7VXH4WPC92zcAxNNzIL6QQ2NGOtUeE7HUJ Mz2GfK4jGnTrOGJZYUAvqYM0uN4YPdUXe6B3NXFwI6vPzjJ07yUtVa+rT7LuLrzBZB T+Mi8h/9Z97qW0iaRuX1rO2+l0o91FAvqLnukhPnJi+vPlDHOsvdBgWHFKeoDlQcVy y1FjtKs6sPL10nt1Jj+US5ALXsNMyL5i8fcl7+1bnb1mvGyfv8aSvj99CUsgdKhCie 8koIuHUfm14Xg== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4P4YPw0Y2lz6tpd; Sun, 29 Jan 2023 15:20:51 +0100 (CET) From: Ihor Radchenko To: rms@gnu.org Cc: theophilusx@gmail.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Subject: Re: Supporting non-free SQL clients in ob-sql (was: [PATCH] ob-sql: Add support for Athena) In-Reply-To: References: <874jsqbvfq.fsf@kraus.my> <87358an35i.fsf@localhost> <63c5b8db.170a0220.e466f.2573@mx.google.com> <87o7qxmr6y.fsf@kraus.my> <87fsc9iifs.fsf@localhost> <87y1pte7x1.fsf@localhost> <63cef162.170a0220.faa08.09ef@mx.google.com> <877cx9wq64.fsf@localhost> Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2023 14:21:26 +0000 Message-ID: <87k015e80p.fsf@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1675002130; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=RcTyZLqTHA7yAhI1ERW+lto8fizU9yRmsTfagtUFCgI=; b=qE7EZ/gREYkmC5Ui1cmUjmXZTktdsIDBUh7Dx7OKDB+iBkOBYCp+ag+w1rYpxmIAgbk6UH 4SjcQrtyk8aXlecOVtelg2670t6iUwh76xR7OkvoOuHu5MRoPPaKZIM5VEE86VAt44WFF3 LT9K1MEg0nlvk6KddiYAFBk6zh0/JvmOdi1Z/pmqvEtueFBLQbiVoxFQUdxkp7USAWoYRp eSrZyoi5Y3orLL0EhVwL9/O3Bn4PgeQj6bMGWKsrIIspHbC9eh3sGKEH+BQN/CzVROcUsZ X7xCAEcH7SBKGfG4TjWKzhN+KYDLEGWG/EGlaHyh86wGBOR8GXScCdDm6PCQwQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b="hnji/jkA"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1675002130; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=pkfwV1qQS/sj9DQoY60x2Z0ctRAhQegyhnzbVfATaG5bORYzMBi4tD3VEgIYZrjCIgLwMu /p0PjN2SebjnF7IJ1tfzWgr+y45R5NfTaDCLBv1O3iRalL/mMxeW1LVjR9LT4Yo8XhamAU Lu30svaL5DnhxOSGNRAWM3t7M0q5gW+KX+O1X6Jfu1LHUBKH+LxMytzLEin1cwFKVMka4o lZb40Ii6lTWiGNaBYrDFnf8/pjS/qmfVJNxSQIgbKNy7WIn7Ve9HP5551cIqNEtSY3Z2tM CZ7XNgiGBW4Wr/E1HZoo0wFLWK06xUoZbj2b/zg0OI+E8SShPU3e/dUvEjxIwA== Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b="hnji/jkA"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -11.14 X-Spam-Score: -11.14 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 4B33335FEE X-TUID: srF8lUCvfrDO Richard Stallman writes: > > Would it then make sense to note the reasons why we support one or > > another non-free software in a separate file like etc/NON-FREE-SUPPORT? > > I think it is a good idea to document the reasoning for these > decision. But I think it does not necessarily have to be centralized > in one file for all of Emacs. Another alternative, also natural, > would be to describe these decisions with the code that implements the > support. Will file header be a good place? Note that there is little point adding the reasons behind supporting non-free software if they cannot be easily found. Ideally, it should be a standard place documented as code convention. Then, people can consistently check the reasons (or lack of) behind each individual non-free software support decision. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at