From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Philip Rooke <phil@yax.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Status of Org-mode in GNU Emacs
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 22:31:35 +0000
Message-ID: <87irqa6p88.fsf@sarge.yax.org.uk>
References: <8a286ed43b46f7ebbcd33064c53c8599@science.uva.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FL6Qn-0008DH-BJ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Mar 2006 17:31:25 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FL6Ql-0008Cv-Ly
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Mar 2006 17:31:24 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FL6Ql-0008Cs-JJ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Mar 2006 17:31:23 -0500
Received: from [81.2.121.252] (helo=sarge.yax.org.uk)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1FL6WB-0000VJ-ER
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Mar 2006 17:36:59 -0500
In-Reply-To: <8a286ed43b46f7ebbcd33064c53c8599@science.uva.nl> (Carsten
	Dominik's message of "Sun, 12 Mar 2006 07:49:20 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl> writes:

> Obviously, I do want to have a stable and well-tested version of
> org.el in that Emacs.  So if anyone still has outstanding issues that
> could be termed a bug, please let me/us know soon.  Also, if there are
> people using an Emacs from the CVS head, please let me know if there
> are any problems with the org.el in that tree.

I am currently using a version of the cvs head taken last weekend, so
I am reasonably current.  I've not noticed any bugs over the last
week although there are some trivial typos in the info manual, are
you interested in a note of these?

Phil