From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard KLINDA Subject: checkbox statistics Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 12:47:25 +0200 Message-ID: <87iqky8erm.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LwDWq-0004Zf-Dm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2009 06:48:40 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LwDWl-0004Yn-Ns for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2009 06:48:39 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48482 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LwDWl-0004Yk-Hu for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2009 06:48:35 -0400 Received: from viefep16-int.chello.at ([62.179.121.36]:43408) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LwDWk-0002Xo-Rp for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2009 06:48:35 -0400 Received: from edge02.upc.biz ([192.168.13.237]) by viefep16-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.7.09.01.00 201-2219-108-20080618) with ESMTP id <20090421104823.EQIY10095.viefep16-int.chello.at@edge02.upc.biz> for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2009 12:48:23 +0200 Received: from ignotus by localhost with local (masqmail 0.2.21) id 1LwDVd-4b9-00 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2009 12:47:25 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, currently checkbox statistics only takes into account checkboxes on a single indent level. I would prefer checkbox statistics to show the total number of checkboxes below them, regardless of level. Currently: ,---- | ** TODO [0/2] job | 1) [-] 1 | * [X] a | * [X] b | * [X] c | * [ ] d | * [ ] e | 2) [-] 2 | * [X] a | * [X] b | * [ ] c `---- What I would like is: ,---- | ** TODO [5/10] job | 1) [-] 1 | * [X] a | * [X] b | * [X] c | * [ ] d | * [ ] e | 2) [-] 2 | * [X] a | * [X] b | * [ ] c `---- Is it possible somehow? Thanks, Richard