emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: ross@rosslaird.info (Ross A. Laird)
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Item ranking system?
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:55:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87iqi9o82n.fsf@rosslaird.info> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8763e9ipg6.fsf@fastmail.fm>

Matthew Lundin <mdl@imapmail.org> writes:

> Ian Barton <lists@manor-farm.org> writes:
>> Ross A. Laird wrote:
>>> I'm sure there are many ways in org to accomplish my goal with this
>>> particular project, which is to create a ranking system for items.
>>> Here's the situation: I have about 200 items that I am evaluating. I
>>> need each item to have a title, a tag, a note, and a ranking from 0 to
>>> 5. Then, I need to be able to sort the items by rank, with items ranked
>>> 5 at the top. I know that I can do this using tables in org, but I
>>> prefer the flexibility of headings (some of the items might have long
>>> notes attached to them, or links, or whatever). Also, I don't think I
>>> can tag individual cells in a table, or operate on cells the way I can
>>> with headings in org (move, refile, show and hide, etc.). So, I'm
>>> looking for something that will allow me to have the best of worlds:
>>> flexibility as with headings, and numerical sorting as with table cells.
>> What about making them all TODO items and using the priority filed for
>> sorting. I don't use priorities myself, so I am not sure if you can
>> change A, B, C, etc to 1, 2, 3.
> The easiest way to set custom priorities is to do so in the buffer. You
> could simply add the following line to the top of the relevant file:
> #+PRIORITIES: 1 5 3
> This line sets 1 as the highest priority, 5 as the lowest priority, and
> 3 as the default priority.
> Then, once you have added priorities such as the following...
> * A list
> ** [#5] Some item
> ** [#4] Another item
> ** [#2] Yet another item
> ...you can sort them by calling org-sort (C-c ^ p) on the heading. (C-c ^
> P will sort them in reverse order.)
> The other option here would be to create a "ranking" property for each
> item with predefined entry options. You would still be able to sort the
> list, but you could also view it as columns and capture it in a table
> using dynamic blocks. (Of course, you could also display the priorities
> above in column view.)
> * Some item
>   :RANKING:  3
>   :END:
> * Another item
>   :RANKING:  1
>   :END:
> * Yet another item
>   :RANKING:  5
>   :END:
> Best,
> Matt

Thanks for all the helpful responses. This list is great.



Ross A. Laird, PhD
Chair, Department of Creative Writing
Faculty, Interdisciplinary Expressive Arts
Kwantlen Polytechnic University

  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-03 19:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-03 18:04 Ross A. Laird
2009-07-03 18:16 ` Ian Barton
2009-07-03 18:36   ` Matthew Lundin
2009-07-03 19:55     ` Ross A. Laird [this message]
2009-07-03 21:57       ` Samuel Wales
2009-07-03 18:21 ` Nick Dokos
2009-07-03 18:46   ` Nick Dokos

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87iqi9o82n.fsf@rosslaird.info \
    --to=ross@rosslaird.info \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    --subject='Re: Item ranking system?' \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this inbox:


This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).