From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Patch for windowing problem Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 09:54:39 +0200 Message-ID: <87iqhrlp6o.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <4A5F8060.3060607@sift.info> <87k5281a7r.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <4A5FC780.5020909@sift.info> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MRiHR-0008UT-6a for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 03:54:57 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MRiHJ-0008OX-Ln for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 03:54:53 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43376 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MRiHJ-0008OK-2p for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 03:54:49 -0400 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:48501) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MRiHI-000477-GM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 03:54:48 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.245]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MRiHH-0002pU-S4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 03:54:48 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c5so98858rvf.2 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 00:54:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A5FC780.5020909@sift.info> (Robert Goldman's message of "Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:36:16 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Robert Goldman Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Robert Goldman writes: > Bastien wrote: >> Yes, would be nice if the Aquamacs crowd could test this! >> >> Thanks Robert for the patch. > > Actually, let me clarify -- it's even more important for the > NON-Aquamacs crowd to test this. I am pretty confident it does The > Right Thing on Aquamacs, but aquamacs uses frames much more heavily than > normal emacs. And I don't use org-mode on normal emacs right now. So > it's there that we could look for me getting the frame management more > wrong. > > I should also say, though, that if you're a big frame user on normal > emacs, this should also be a help to you, not just to aquamacs users. I'm using a single frame so I can't really test it. Please frame-people have a look at this patch. In any case, not a critical issue, I let Carsten take care of it when he's back. Thanks, -- Bastien