From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Xiao-Yong Jin Subject: Re: Suggestion: rename Org Font Lock customization group Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 15:34:56 -0400 Message-ID: <87iq8gfden.fsf@columbia.edu> References: <87d3yopgna.fsf@stats.ox.ac.uk> <87mxxsfkpx.fsf@columbia.edu> <871vf4pbkv.fsf@stats.ox.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NvyGP-0007vl-Bo for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 15:35:13 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35128 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NvyGK-0007v2-Sj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 15:35:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NvyGJ-0002dL-DP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 15:35:08 -0400 Received: from tarap.cc.columbia.edu ([128.59.29.7]:59436) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NvyGJ-0002dH-BE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 15:35:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <871vf4pbkv.fsf@stats.ox.ac.uk> (Dan Davison's message of "Sun, 28 Mar 2010 14:04:16 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Dan Davison Cc: emacs org-mode mailing list On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 14:04:16 -0400, Dan Davison wrote: > Right, when being friendly to new users is the purpose of customize. > A further argument that "Font Lock" is a misnomer is that "Org Odd > Levels Only" is not related to font lock. It could be put in Structure, > but I think the decision to put it in the same group as all the other > variables related to appearance made sense. > And I think there may be other examples of things that are more > helpfully described as "Appearance" than "Font Lock". For example, some > of the options in the "Org Startup" group might benefit from also having > an entry in an appearance group, e.g. org-hide-block-startup. Or perhaps > we could have an option to control whether links to images are replaced > in the buffer by the image? (a topic for a different thread...) Hi Dan, I previously thought it might confuse new users if we use different term specifically for org-mode. But now I completely agree with you. "Appearance" is indeed a much better word for this customize group. -- J c/* __o/* X <\ * (__ Y */\ <